Name the conditions upon which the climate of a country depends and explain the reason

Name the conditions upon which the climate of a country depends, and explain the reason for any one of them3. Where are silver, platinum, tin, wool, wheat, palm oil, furs and cacao from?2. Subtract 3.25741 from 3.3; multiply 28.436 by 8.245; and divide .86655 by 26.53 Find the square root of 5.185,440,100Geography1. “It is no comment on standards to say things are simply different.”The current headmaster of King Edward’s School, Roger Dancey, said: “Looking at this paper is great fun but not proof we’ve dumbed down … education moves on.”A spokeswoman for the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority said it was difficult to compare an entrance exam for one of Victorian Britain’s top schools with today’s tests.THE 1898 EXAMNo reference aids or calculators allowed And certainly not GoogleQUESTIONSArithmetic1 Multiply 642035 by 245062. The questions “look mind-numbingly dull and not very difficult to mug up on”, he said. “It is not evidence of dumbing down, just that the goalposts have moved.

What would 1898 candidates have made of: ‘Use a spreadsheet to answer the arithmetic questions. “We’re spending more and more to keep our children at school longer and longer, and yet they know less than their peers did 20, 50, 100 years ago,” he said.But Paul Woodruff, the director of studies at St Paul’s School in London, said the papers “read like Sellars and Yeatman in 1066 and All That”. An exam in English grammar involves a handwriting test and requires significant analytical ability.Experts said A-level and GCSE students would struggle to pass the papers, which were published by The Spectator after being discovered by reader Humphrey Stanbury, whose father sat them and passed.Chris Woodhead, the former chief inspector of schools, said politicians needed to accept the “sad truth” of falling standards. Arithmetic tasks included advanced fractions and sums in pounds, shilling and pence. The difficulties of getting into a good secondary school are, it seems, not new. The former chart star had blamed his jungle diet.Harvey, 30, had found it tough in the camp from day one.When he arrived in Australia he learned that his grandmother had died. He decided to carry on with the show and entered the jungle a day late.On Wednesday he faced the grim House of Pies challenge in which he had to eat insect-infested pies covered by a swarm of flies.And viewers had seen Harvey become increasingly upset by the number of flies which had found their way into his camp bed.The meagre diet of rice had also been getting him down.”I don’t know how much longer I can do this,” he complained shortly before his departure “I’m being serious I need a f****** sandwich.”.

Brian Harvey quit the jungle today after a blazing row with Janet Street-Porter over his flatulence.
Janet, the IoS’s editor-at-large, hit the roof when the former East 17 star broke wind close to where she was making dinner.She shouted at him – and he responded by packing his bags and storming out of the camp.Furious Brian said he was sick of being “treated like a kid” in front of millions of viewers.It was not the first time Janet had clashed with Brian over breaking wind. The Attorney General and the Metropolitan police issued repeated warnings to the media that they should not identify the men.But the Daily Star went ahead and named the men in an article headlined “Bramble is bailed”, accompanied by a pixellated picture of the footballer.Although the teenager did not see the article, Mr Havers argued that there was a substantial risk that she would have read it and, as a result, looked for photographs of the men. But after police investigations, the Crown Prosecution Service decided there was insufficient evidence to bring any prosecutions.Philip Havers QC, representing the Attorney General, told the court that the teenager’s allegations of rape had sparked a “frenzied media interest”. He dismissed as “mere speculation” the suggestion put forward by the Daily Star that she could have learned their identities from the publicist Max Clifford, who was hired by her family.The 17-year-old alleged that she was raped and subjected to a number of serious sexual assaults at the Grosvenor House hotel on Park Lane in London on 27 September 2003. But when the article was published on 23 October last year, the police investigation into the rape claims was still under way.Lord Justice Rose and Mr Justice Pitchman ruled that, by naming the men, the Daily Star had created a “real, substantial, more-than-remote risk” and that the course of justice would be “seriously impeded or prejudiced”.Lord Justice Rose said there was no evidence that the girl already knew who the men were at the time of the article.